At the
risk of
starting
an
all-encompassing
debate
about
the
CFNM
genre
and what
should
or
should
not be
featured
in such
a site,
I really
don't
think
that
CFNM
Secret
has got
it
right.
But I
want to
start
with the
positives
because
I do
want to
address
these
issues,
and
they're
not
likely
to be
that
positive.
CFNM
sites
tend to
have
blowjobs
and
handjobs
for the
most
part but
this one
progresses
on to
full-blown
hardcore
sex.
Yes,
we'll
address
that
later.
But all
of the
videos
take the
form of
group
sessions
with
four or
five
women
teaming
up
against
one guy
in some
strange
uniform-involved
scenarios
which
were far
better
produced
and far
more
involved
than I
was
really
expecting.
All
manner
of
strange
clothed
lesbian
occurrences
take
place as
the guy
is
usually
serviced
by one
or two
of the
girls.
It all
sounds
peculiar
and odd
enough
to
qualify
it as
that
rare
thing in
pornography
-
something
faintly
original.
The
site, as
is
typical
from the
Reality
Kings
guys, is
a brand
new one
launched
with
very
little
currently
on board
but with
all 20+
sites
from the
company
included
in the
deal and
some
utterly
stunning
porn
stars on
board to
perform.
But I
must say
that I
had my
problems
with
CFNM
Secret.
I
personally
don't
'get'
the
'clothed
female
nude
male'
genre at
all, but
that's
nothing
remarkable.
I don't
'get'
many of
the
fetishes
I review
but I
still
understand
why they
would
appeal
and that
they
have
their
fans,
and it's
no
different
here.
But
CFNM
Secret
doesn't
do its
job,
surely?
On all
of the
CFNM
sites
I've
seen to
date,
the
female
models
stay,
well,
clothed.
That's
rather a
no-brainer
considering
the
genre, I
think.
Not,
apparently,
for this
site,
where
the
female
performers
routinely
and
quite
happily
strip
off.
That's
not
right,
surely?
If the
ladies
are not
keeping
their
clothes
on and
sticking
to the
rules,
then
what do
you have
here?
Well,
it's
just
another
hardcore
site,
isn't
it? I do
feel
somewhat
at odds
with my
opinion
on the
site
because
if I go
to see a
film
that I
thought
was
going to
be a
Western,
and it
wasn't
really
that
much of
a
Western,
am I
that
bothered
as long
as it's
really
good?
Personally,
no. But
can the
same
comparison
be made
to porn?
To a
certain
extent I
think it
can be.
But I
rather
think
that
porn
appeals
more to
absolutely
specific
fetishes
and
tastes
than
mainstream
movies
do. A
lot of
people
turn up
at a
site
expecting
a
certain
thing
and if
you
don't
deliver,
then
they
have
wasted
their
money
whether
you've
produced
an AVN
Award-winning
spectacle
or not.
Initially
I was
surprised
to see
user
comments
complaining
about
the
perceived
lack of
female
nudity
on
CFNM
Secret,
but
they're
more
likely
to have
wandered
in from
elsewhere
in the
network
and
wondered
what the
hell
this was
all
about.
Interestingly,
there
were no
CFNM
fans
making
the
reverse
complaint.
If it's
not
going to
stick to
its
original
conceit
all the
way
through
its
pages,
and I
don't
doubt
there
will be
more,
then you
have to
wonder
what the
point of
it is.
You also
have to
wonder
after
several
new-ish
sites
that
have
failed
to set
the
pulses
racing
if
Reality
Kings
really
need a
big new
hit.
Technically,
the
videos
here
will be
well
shot,
feature
beautiful
stars
and be
thoroughly
enjoyable
for
general
hardcore
fans.
That's
all
going to
be
beside
the
point
though
if you
wanted,
and I
know you
don't
get to
say this
much in
the
realm of
pornography,
the
ladies
to keep
their
kit on.
|
